<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Blog entries</title>
		<description>Blog entries</description>
		<link>http://www.ip-contingency-lawyer.com</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 20:46:14 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>C.R. Bard Inc. alleges infringement of vascular graft technology</title>
			<link>http://www.ip-contingency-lawyer.com/intellectual-property-blog/cr-bard-inc-alleges-infringement-of-vascular-graft-technology.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;C.R. Bard Inc., a major manufacturer of products related to vascular, urology and oncology disease, has filed a lawsuit against two of its competitors for allegedly infringing on Bard&amp;rsquo;s patent for a &amp;ldquo;Prosthetic Vascular Graft&amp;rdquo; using a specialized plastic called expanded polytetrafluoroethylene.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The two defendants in the case are Endologix and Atrium Medical Corp. Endologix develops and manufactures products to allow for minimally invasive treatment of vascular disRead More...</description>
			<author>Tara Williams</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 20:08:07 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Blizzard Entertainment wins $88.6 million settlement for IP infringement</title>
			<link>http://www.ip-contingency-lawyer.com/intellectual-property-blog/blizzard-entertainment-wins-886-million-settlement-for-ip-infringement.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Scapegaming was recently ordered to pay Blizzard Entertainment $88.6 million for violating intellectual property rights for allowing players to access a set of World of Warcraft emulator servers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;An emulator server (also known as a private server) refers to an Internet server that mimics the behavior of another server. In this case, Scapegaming&amp;rsquo;s emulator servers allowed people to connect to and play World of Wizard without using official Blizzard servers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;BlizzaRead More...</description>
			<author>Tara Williams</author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 18:21:03 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Microsoft Settles Piracy Lawsuit Against Chinese Company</title>
			<link>http://www.ip-contingency-lawyer.com/intellectual-property-blog/microsoft-settles-piracy-lawsuit-against-chinese-company.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft&amp;rsquo;s Second Chinese Piracy Lawsuit in a Year&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Microsoft settled a lawsuit against a large Chinese company for using unlicensed software in its operations.&amp;nbsp; In the settlement, CITIC Kington Securities of Hangzhou, China will buy $477,000 of Microsoft software. The suit was filed in a court in the city of Hangzhou.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is the second Chinese piracy suit the software giant has won this year. In April, a court in Shanghai ruled against a Chinese insurance coRead More...</description>
			<author>Tara Williams</author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 06:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Judge Dismisses Lawsuit by St. Louis company against Asian Competitors</title>
			<link>http://www.ip-contingency-lawyer.com/intellectual-property-blog/judge-dismisses-lawsuit-by-st-louis-company-against-asian-competitors.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Won similar lawsuits in Germany, China and Korea&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When intellectual property law becomes international, it can produce seemingly contradictory results.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio dismissed a suit filed five years ago by St. Louis-based Solutia Inc. against Sinorgchem of China and Kumho Petrochemical of South Korea. The suit alleged that the companies copied Solutia&amp;rsquo;s patented eco-friendly process for preventing rubber from degrading, aRead More...</description>
			<author>Tara Williams</author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 06:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Google Wins Summary Judgment in Copyright Infringement Case Against Viacom</title>
			<link>http://www.ip-contingency-lawyer.com/intellectual-property-blog/google-wins-summary-judgment-in-copyright-infringement-case-against-viacom.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Judge Declares Copyright Owner Must Monitor Its Own Products&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York has ruled in favor of Google in its long-standing dispute with Viacom International Inc.&lt;br/&gt;Viacom International alleged that Google was liable for copyright infringement for publishing copyright-protected content on its YouTube site. The Court declared that Google was protected by provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, which basically statesRead More...</description>
			<author>Tara Williams</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:49:10 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>eBay Faces $3.8 Billion Suit Over Patented E-Commerce Technology</title>
			<link>http://www.ip-contingency-lawyer.com/intellectual-property-blog/ebay-faces-38-billion-suit-over-patented-e-commerce-technology.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;XPRT Venures LLC of Greenwich, Conn. has filed suit for $3.8 billion against eBay for allegedly copying six of its patents related to the online payment process, Pay Pal. The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court, District of Delaware on July 13, 2010.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;XPRT further alleges that the infringement was &amp;ldquo;willful and malicious.&amp;rdquo; If found guilty of willful and malicious infringement, the court could award up to three times the $3.8 billion as punitive damages.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Read More...</description>
			<author>Tara Williams</author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 06:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Metso settles intellectual property lawsuit for $25 million</title>
			<link>http://www.ip-contingency-lawyer.com/intellectual-property-blog/metso-settles-intellectual-property-lawsuit-for-25-million.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;FLSmidth-Excel LLC and Excel Foundry &amp;amp; Machine, Inc., has recently settled an intellectual property dispute with Metso Minerals Industries, Inc. for approximately $25 million. The dispute centered on a trade secret used to create high-performance conical rock crushers used by the mining industry.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The trade secret was allegedly stolen from Metso and passed on to the defendant by two individuals, one of whom was an ex-employee of Metso, and the other an employee of a MetsRead More...</description>
			<author>Tara Williams</author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 06:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Discovery Alleges Amazon.com’s Kindle E-book Reader Infringes on Patent </title>
			<link>http://www.ip-contingency-lawyer.com/intellectual-property-blog/discovery-alleges-amazoncoms-kindle-e-book-reader-infringes-on-patent-.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;New technologies open the door to new patent infringement issues, and e-book readers are no exception.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Discovery Patent Holdings, the intellectual property subsidiary of Discovery Communications, has filed two suits in as many years claiming that Amazon.com Inc. has infringed on patents when creating its popular line of Kindle e-book readers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;Discovery Patent Holdings filed its first suit in March 2009, alleging that Amazon.com infringed on its patents when creating Read More...</description>
			<author>Tara Williams</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 16:21:34 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Axcess International Files Conflict of Interest Suit Against International Law Firm</title>
			<link>http://www.ip-contingency-lawyer.com/intellectual-property-blog/axcess-international-files-conflict-of-interest-suit-against-international-law-firm.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Axcess International, Inc. has filed suit against the international law firm Baker Botts for conflict of interest in intellectual property matters. If successful, the suit could cost Baker Botts millions of dollars.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas on July 15. In the suit, Axcess claims that Baker Botts had a conflict of interest when it concurrently provided intellectual property advice to both companies, and assisted both coRead More...</description>
			<author>Tara Williams</author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:18:44 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>K-TEC Inc. wins $11 million for infringement of blender patents</title>
			<link>http://www.ip-contingency-lawyer.com/intellectual-property-blog/k-tec-inc-wins-11-million-for-infringement-of-blender-patents.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;lsquo;Wilfulness&amp;rsquo; verdict by jury opens case up to treble damages&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In another case for a small inventor over a giant conglomerate, K-TEC Inc., of Orem, Utah won an $11 million settlement over blending industry giant Vita-Mix Corp. over its patented Blendtec blender technology.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The case was heard in the U.S. District Court, District of Utah.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The case alleged that Vita-Mix Corp. of Cleveland, Ohio infringed on a variety of K-TEC patents, including its fiveRead More...</description>
			<author>Tara Williams</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:24:06 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Supreme Court: NFL teams are separate entities when it comes to apparel licensing</title>
			<link>http://www.ip-contingency-lawyer.com/intellectual-property-blog/supreme-court-nfl-teams-are-separate-entities-when-it-comes-to-apparel-licensing.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;You may not realize it, but whenever you purchase a NFL jersey or hat, you are purchasing property which may be the subject of a major intellectual property dispute.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the 2010 case American Needle v. National Football League (08-661), the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the NFL cannot act as one entity when licensing team apparel. The dispute arose after a decision was made by the NFL in 2001 to give Reebox an exclusive 10-year contract to manufacture various pieced of Read More...</description>
			<author>Tara Williams</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 06:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Custom Glass of Carolinas Wins IP Suit</title>
			<link>http://www.ip-contingency-lawyer.com/intellectual-property-blog/custom-glass-of-carolinas-wins-ip-suit.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Judge Awards $8 million, plus permanent injunctive order&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Custom Glass Products of Carolina Inc., headquartered in Salisbury, NC won a judgment against Infini-Lite LLC of Tucker, Ga., for infringing on its patented Decralite grids. The judgment provides a permanent injunction against Infini-Lite for the use of Decralite patents and the Decralite trademark, as well as $8 million in damages. Custom Glass Products was actually the defendant in the case.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;Decralite Grid SystRead More...</description>
			<author>Tara Williams</author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 06:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Software giants file competing patent infringement lawsuits</title>
			<link>http://www.ip-contingency-lawyer.com/intellectual-property-blog/software-giants-file-competing-patent-infringement-lawsuits.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Microsoft, Salesforce.com compete in cloud-computing market&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Two software giants are battling it out in the courts, both accusing the other of patent infringement.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;The competing lawsuits pit Microsoft, the world&amp;rsquo;s largest software maker, against&amp;nbsp; Salesforce.com, the world&amp;rsquo;s biggest seller of Web-based customer-management programs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;Both companies are vying for a place in the expanding&amp;nbsp; cloud-computing market. Last month, Microsoft CorRead More...</description>
			<author>Tara Williams</author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:02:45 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Progressive Charges Liberty Mutual in Patent Infringement Case</title>
			<link>http://www.ip-contingency-lawyer.com/intellectual-property-blog/progressive-charges-liberty-mutual-in-patent-infringement-case.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Progressive Corp., an auto insurance company, has accused Liberty Mutual, another insurance company, of infringing on patents it holds for automobile onboard monitoring systems. Such systems capture data regarding a driver&amp;rsquo;s driving habits.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;In 1999, Progressive began offering an in-car monitoring system. The voluntary system, named MyRate, monitors such items as how fast a driver travels, times of travel, and average daily mileage.&amp;nbsp; The company uses this informRead More...</description>
			<author>Tara Williams</author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jun 2010 18:32:12 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Dow Chemicals Awarded $61.7 Million in Suit Against Novo Chemical Corp. </title>
			<link>http://www.ip-contingency-lawyer.com/intellectual-property-blog/dow-chemicals-awarded-617-million-in-suit-against-novo-chemical-corp-.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Dow Chemical was awarded $61.7 million in a patent infringement lawsuit against Nova Chemicals Corp. of Canada.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A judge in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware ruled in Dow&amp;rsquo;s favor after a jury found that Nova Chemicals Corp. infringed on two patents related to strong plastics. Nova Chemical Corp. countered that the patents were invalid due to missing data.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The suit was initially fined in 2005. The final ruling was signed on May 20, 2010.&amp;nRead More...</description>
			<author>Tara Williams</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 13:14:56 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Court Awards Retractable Technologies $5M in suit against Becton, Dickinson</title>
			<link>http://www.ip-contingency-lawyer.com/intellectual-property-blog/court-awards-retractable-technologies-5m-in-suit-against-becton-dickinson.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;The US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, has awarded Retractable Technologies Inc. $5 million in a patent infringement suit against Becton, Dickinson and Co. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;Retractable Technologies manufactures VanishPoint&amp;reg; automated retraction safety syringes, automated retractions blood collection devices and automated retraction IC catheters. Becton, Dickinson manufactures similar retractable safety syringes under the brand name &amp;ldquo;Integra.&amp;rRead More...</description>
			<author>Tara Williams</author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:27:24 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Marine Polymer Technologies awarded $29.4 million in suit against HemCon Medical Technologies</title>
			<link>http://www.ip-contingency-lawyer.com/intellectual-property-blog/marine-polymer-technologies-awarded-294-million-in-suit-against-hemcon-medical-technologies.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;A federal jury for the US District Court for the District of New Hampshire has awarded Marine Polymer Technologies&amp;nbsp; $29.4 million in a patent infringement suit against HemCon Medical Technologies.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The suit concerned compounds used in hemostatic bandages used to prevent severe blood loss.&amp;nbsp; HemCon sold the allegedly infringing products to the military since 2003, but in the last two years began selling to the civilian market. These sales caught the attention of Marine PolymRead More...</description>
			<author>Tara Williams</author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 19:38:19 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Metso Receives $25M in Patent Infringement Settlement</title>
			<link>http://www.ip-contingency-lawyer.com/intellectual-property-blog/metso-receives-25m-in-patent-infringement-settlement.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Metso Announces Settlement of Patent Infringement Suit under Confidential Terms&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Metso Corporation&amp;rsquo;s patent infringement lawsuit filed against FLSmidth-Excel, LLC, Excel Foundry &amp;amp; Machine, Inc., et al. settles under the terms of a confidential settlement agreement.&amp;nbsp; Metso did reveal that it received approximately $25M as compensation under the terms the settlement.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Metso, a global supplier of mining equipment, is based in Helsinki, Finland and has Read More...</description>
			<author>Tara Williams</author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:36:19 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Gibson Guitar Settles Case Against Wal-Mart Stores, Viacom and Electronic Arts and Others</title>
			<link>http://www.ip-contingency-lawyer.com/intellectual-property-blog/gibson-guitar-settles-case-against-wal-mart-stores-viacom-and-electronic-arts-and-others.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Under undisclosed terms, Gibson Guitar agreed to settle its patent infringement lawsuit against Wal-Mart Stores, Viacom Inc. and Electronic Arts, Inc., which patents allegedly cover the &amp;ldquo;Rock Band&amp;rdquo; music videogame.&amp;nbsp; Some of the other retailers also mentioned in the suit included Amazon.com, and Target Corp.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The patents related to methods for simulating a musical concert.&amp;nbsp; The parties expect to dismiss the suit this month.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;SOURCE:&amp;nbsp;Read More...</description>
			<author>Tara Williams</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:59:22 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>DDB Technologies files patent infringement lawsuit against AOL, NHL</title>
			<link>http://www.ip-contingency-lawyer.com/intellectual-property-blog/ddb-technologies-files-patent-infringement-lawsuit-against-aol-nhl.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;In May 2010, DDB Technologies, LLC filed patent infringement lawsuits against AOL Inc., NHL Interactive CyberEnterprises LLC, NHL Enterprises LP, and&amp;nbsp; NHL Enterprises Inc., claiming the companies infringed a patent portfolio related to sports broadcasting technologies.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The patents-at-issue, US Patent Nos. 5,526,479, 5,671,347, 6,204,862, and 7,373,587, cover such technologies as play-by-play text and animation and real-time simulation of a sporting event.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;DDB TeRead More...</description>
			<author>Intellectual Property Blog</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:50:13 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
