Home Blog
May 17

Court rules Callaway Golf patents invalid in patent infringement lawsuit against Acushnet

Posted by: IP News Blog |
Tagged in: Untagged 

On March 29, 2010, a jury in the United States District Court, District Court of Delaware found four of Callaway Golf Company’s patents are invalid, ruling against the company in its patent infringement lawsuit filed against Acushnet that began in 2006.

Read More...
May 14

Individual inventor awarded $25M from home improvement giant, Home Depot, in patent infringement lawsuit

Posted by: IP News Blog |
Tagged in: Untagged 

Almost $10 million of the award attributed to defendant’s bad conduct

Read More...
May 12

Texas district court denies Radio Shack Corp. stay of proceedings request

Posted by: IP News Blog |
Tagged in: Untagged 

As announced in recent issue of Docket Report, a decision by the U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division underscores just how unpredictable a court ruling can be.

Read More...
May 11

Court awards Smith and Nephew $5 million in patent infringement lawsuit

Posted by: IP News Blog |
Tagged in: Untagged 

According to a recent Docket Report issue, on March 30, 2010, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas awarded Smith and Nephew, Inc. $5,185,667 after a jury found Arthrex, Inc. infringed its patent. The award includes $4,713,000 in damages and $472,667 in pre-judgment interest.

Read More...
May 10

Aribex settles patent infringement lawsuit over hand-held X-ray device

Posted by: IP News Blog |
Tagged in: Untagged 

In April 2010, Aribex, Inc. announced a settlement of its patent infringement lawsuit filed against Sigma Biomedics, DentalAire Products International and DigiMed. The lawsuit, filed in October 2009, claimed defendants infringed Aribex’s patent for a hand-held X-ray device (US Patent No. 7,496,178, entitled “Portable x-ray device”).

Read More...
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Our Law Firm Handles Some Patent Infringement Cases on a Contingency Fee Basis.

Name:
Phone Number:
Address
E-Mail Address:
Case Details:
Submission of any information to IP-Contingency-Lawyer.Com does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Our Attorneys are licensed to practice law in North Carolina. Should you reside in another state, the law firm may need to associate with local counsel to assist you in accordance with the laws and regulations of your jurisdiction.

Follow us on Twitter!